CONJUNCTIVAL HYPEREMIA WAS LESS SEVERE WITH PRESERVATIVE-FREE LATANOPROST (STUDY EYE)1
IN THE US AND EUROPEAN PHASE III TRIALS
In clinical trials, eye irritation was 19% for IYUZEH (n=72) vs 31% for XALATAN® (n=112).2
The US trial was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, observer-masked, noninferiority phase III trial (N=335) conducted at 31 sites across the US to evaluate the noninferiority of IYUZEH compared to XALATAN in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.3 The European trial was a noninferiority study comparing mean IOP in patients who used preservative-free latanoprost and XALATAN at day 15, day 42, and day 84.1
XALATAN is a registered trademark of Pfizer PFE Holdings 4 LLC, a Viatris Company.

73%
of patients found preservative-free latanoprost to be “better” or “much better” tolerated than prior preserved treatment. 22% found it to be the same.4

This was a multicenter, international observational study conducted in routine ophthalmology practices across Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain. A total of 1,541 patients who had been using preserved topical glaucoma medications were surveyed after switching to preservative-free formulations, with the aim of assessing patient satisfaction and tolerability.4
♠The results of this study should be considered in the context of the limitations of this type of evidence. While these findings provide insights into the real-world performance of IYUZEH, they may not be directly comparable to results from clinical trials.


Irwin dreaded using his daily preservative-containing medication because of discomfort. He relied on artificial tears for relief and began looking for a more comfortable treatment option.
Since switching to preservative-free IYUZEH, Irwin takes his medication as prescribed and is having a more tolerable experience.
†Patient portrayal. Not an actual patient.





